The Data Management Paradox: Why Smart Companies Still Get It Wrong

Every executive knows data is critical. Yet sophisticated organisations repeatedly fail at data management. The problem isn't ignorance—it's something far more deceptive.

Key Insight:

The companies that struggle most with data aren't the ones who undervalue it—they're the ones who overvalue it in the wrong ways. They treat data as a resource to be stored rather than a tool to be utilised.

The Paradox Explained

Companies invest millions in collecting and storing data, then find themselves unable to answer simple questions that matter for business decisions.

Why This Happens

Most consultants will tell you the problem is technology, governance, or skills. We've found it's none of these. The root cause is misaligned incentives and invisible organisational antibodies that reject good data practices.

The Three Hidden Killers:

1. The Optimisation Trap

Every department optimises their own data capture and reporting. Sales builds their dashboard. Finance builds theirs. Operations builds theirs. Each is internally consistent. But ask them all to report on "revenue" and you'll get three different numbers—because they're measuring subtly different things at different points in time.

The fix isn't standardisation—it's ruthless prioritisation. Most companies need 10-15 genuinely important metrics tracked consistently. Everything else is noise.

2. The Trust Deficit

Here's what happens in every transformation we've led: You implement a new data system. The data quality improves dramatically. Then usage drops to zero within six months.

Why does this happen? Middle managers have long associated "data-driven decisions" with outcomes they disagree with, often justified by selectively chosen statistics. When the new system reveals uncomfortable truths—such as regional underperformance or the lack of profitability in a flagship product—they don't address the issues. Instead, they question the validity of the data.

You can't fix this with better technology. You fix it by showing, repeatedly, that data- driven insights lead to better decisions and better outcomes—not blame and consequences.

3. The Complexity Illusion

We recently worked with a private financial services firm that had complicated data and systems infrastructure. Their data team spent 80% of their time on integration and only 20% on analysis. The CEO's conclusion? "We need better integration tools."

However, the true need was to streamline their data sources by eliminating redundant ones. The complexity was not indicative of growth but rather the result of accumulated, outdated initiatives that had not been phased out.

The path to better data management is usually subtraction, not addition.

The Counter-Intuitive Approach That Actually Works

After years of trial and error across dozens of engagements, we've developed an approach that consistently works.

1. Step 1: Start with Decisions, Not Data

   Identify the 5-10 most important decisions your company makes repeatedly. Not metrics—decisions. "Should we expand into this market?" "Should we acquire this company?" "Should we discontinue this product?" Then work backwards to identify what data would actually inform those decisions.

   
   

2. Step 2: Build Trust Through Transparency

   Make all data quality issues visible. When data is wrong, say so publicly. When metrics conflict, show the conflicts. Counterintuitively, this builds trust faster than trying to present a perfect picture. People trust systems that admit their limitations more than systems that claim perfection.

   
   

3. Step 3: Aggressively Sunset

   For every new data source you add, retire two old ones. For every new report you create, delete three existing ones. This forces prioritisation and prevents the complexity creep that kills most data initiatives.

   
   

4. Step 4: Reward Data Hygiene Like You Reward Revenue

   If maintaining clean data isn't in anyone's performance objectives, it won't happen. We've seen companies transform their data quality within quarters by simply adding "data quality score" as a weighted component of manager incentives.

The Real Question You Should Be Asking

Most executives ask: "How do we improve our data management?" That's the wrong question. It leads to more technology, more governance, more complexity. The right question is: "What's the smallest set of data we need to make our most important decisions with confidence?"

Answer that, and you'll realise you need far less data than you think—but much higher quality on the data you do keep.

Where This Matters Most

In our practice, we see the data management paradox create acute problems in three scenarios:

• M&A Transactions: Poor data quality extends due diligence, increases risk perception, and destroys value. We've seen purchase prices reduced purely due to data concerns.

• Digital Transformations: Companies invest millions in new systems, then wonder why adoption is low. Usually, it's because the old data problems followed them to the new platform.

• Private Equity Value Creation: Portfolio companies can't demonstrate value creation to investors because their baseline metrics are unreliable. This depresses exit valuations.

The Bottom Line

Data management isn't a technology problem. It's not even a process problem. It's a strategy problem disguised as an operational issue.

The companies that get this right don't have better tools or smarter people. They have

clearer priorities, stronger trust, and the discipline to say no to complexity.

Everything else is just expensive distraction.

Ready to Cut Through the Complexity?

Whether you're preparing for a transaction, leading a transformation, or managing a portfolio company, we can help you get your data house in order—fast.

Contact Us